Older Fundamentalism -vs- Younger Fundamentalism

I recently found an excellent article comparing older and younger forms of Fundamentalism. I highly recommend you read his entire post. The author lists several defining characteristics of what it means to be a fundamentalist*, and offers a helpful comparison between the differences of older fundamentalist versus the younger fundamentalism we are now seeing.**

I thought this second list was particularly helpful, and have decided to reproduce it here:

• The older generation held primarily to the KJV of the Bible; we hold to multiple version, landing on the NKJV, NASB, and most generally (now), the ESV.
• They always give an invitation; we generally don’t.
• They preach topically as often as they preach expositionally; we preach almost exclusively in an expository manner.
• They hold to closed communion; we hold to open communion.
• They have tended to write off entire genres of music as wicked because of some wickedness within the genre; we tend to evaluate each piece of music as independent from a particular genre.
• They tend to prefer “pastor-ruled” or “congregational-ruled” churches as the government of choice; we tend to prefer “elder rule”.
  
• They tend to be “tee-totalers” when it comes to alcohol; we tend to hold to a “moderation” point of view.
• They tend to be Arminians; we tend to be Calvinists.

* Note 1: One minor disagreement: He includes "baptism by immersion" as a core belief in Fundamentalism. Historically, Methodists and Presbyterians were part of fundamentalism (and at one point made up the majority).

* Note 2: I still maintain that it is unwise to continue to use the word "Fundamentalist". I almost never use this word to describe myself, as it has been almost universally tainted negatively by the militant legalistic element within the camp. I tend to use the words "conservative" and "evangelical" together. I hope more younger fundamentalists drop the F-word, and think ultimately they will be forced too by both sides (the militant element to their right, who objects to their use of the term; and the evangelical element to their left, who misunderstands the implications of the term).