Saturday, December 6, 2008

Another Anti-Religion Campaign


An atheist group has set up an anti-religion display in Olympia, Washington right next to a Holiday Tree and a Nativity scene. Members from an organization called Freedom From Religion Foundation funded the display. The Foundation's co-President said, "Our members want equal time. Not to muscle, not to coerce, but just to have a place at the table."

However, the sign reads (in part), "Religion is but myths and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds". Interestingly, no other display at the event attacked other points of view.

This display comes on the heels of a Washington D.C. atheist ad campaign launched by The American Humanist Association. At a cost of over $40,000 many of the Metro buses were installed with advertising which read, "Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness sake." The ads were placed on the side, rear, and interior of each bus.

These efforts are part of an increasingly aggressive and hostile assault against Christianity. Far from being the peace-loving philosophy it claims, atheism has historically been militant against religion. In this schema, religion is the enemy and an opium for weak minds. Whenever atheism has become the dominate governmental viewpoint it has sought to "free" people from the effects of religion through violent means. One need to only look at the French Revolution or the several examples of Marxist rule within this past century for concrete examples. Even if atheism doesn't become violent, it is inherently intolerant.

Ironically, when asked whether the presence of the atheist display was bothersome, the attendant at the Nativity scene simply said, "I think the Nativity scene will speak for itself." The loving truth of Christ whispered will echo much louder than the hate-filled screams of atheism.

JG

HT: Jim Ackerman

3 comments:

  1. what is ironic is that atheists are every bit as dogmatice about their faith system as the most fundie landmark baptist.

    ReplyDelete
  2. they need to be seen and heard, so they can try to gain some sense of fulfillment. Religion with no sustenance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It would be still be nice to know how an atheist defines "good" and "goodness." Do they vote on it? Do they designate a definer of terms who is then responsible for the boundaries upon which "good" and "goodness" fall? If they are truly consistent with their own beliefs/worldview there cannot BE any such thing as good/goodness, or at the same time, badness/evil. There's just existence. Goodness/badness are moral issues. A consistent atheist cannot have moral values that pertain to anyone but him/herself. Even then, any "moral" values he may have are again not consistent. The atheist is not allowed to have moral values or make moral/ethical judgments any more than this keyboard I am typing with, if they truly ARE atheistic.

    ReplyDelete